Post-Colonial Critique in Nigeria and its disillusionment: A Speech Act Analysis of Chinua Achebe’s There was a Country: A Personal History of Biafra

This study examined the post-colonial disillusionment in Nigeria through a critical analysis of Chinua Achebe’s There Was a Country: A Personal History of Biafra. Employing Speech Act, Trauma and Identity theories as analytical frameworks, the research explored how Achebe’s narrative enunciates the complexities of identity and historical trauma within the context of Nigeria’s post-colonial setting. Drawing mainly on J.L. Austin’s (1962), John Searle’s (1969) and Bach and Harnish’s (1979) Speech Act Theory, the study explores how Achebe’s performative and constative utterances communicate historical grievances, political betrayal, and socio-cultural breakdown during and after the Nigerian-Biafran War. The study further employs Cathy Caruth’s (1996) Trauma Theory to examine how national trauma is encoded in Achebe’s personal and collective narrative, while Stuart Hall’s (1990) Identity Theory gives more understanding on the fragmented post-colonial Nigerian identity as reflected in the author’s ideological expressions. The study analysed how Achebe uses language not only to narrate, but to perform critical socio-political actions such as expressing his grievances, asserting facts, describing situations, ascribing blames, informing the public to mention few. This was achieved using thirty-one extracted excerpts from Chinua Achebe’s There Was a Country. Through qualitative content and quantitative analysis, key speech acts such as expressive, assertive, and informative were identified and examined within the context of historical and political discourse. The study revealed that Achebe’s language choices reflect a deep sense of disillusionment with post-independence Nigeria, stressing the failure of nationalism, ethnic reconciliation, and governance.